Absurdism vs. Nihilism vs. Existentialism

The Shared Starting Point

Existentialism, Nihilism, and Absurdism are three closely related branches of continental philosophy that emerged or gained prominence in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. They all share a common starting point: the rejection of the idea that the universe has a pre-determined, divinely ordained, or inherent purpose. However, once this premise is established, these three philosophies diverge dramatically in how they advise humans to live in such a world.

Existentialism: Creating Your Own Meaning

Existentialism, championed by thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir, operates on the principle that 'existence precedes essence.' This means that humans are born first, exist in the world, and only then define who they are through their choices and actions. Because there is no pre-existing blueprint for human nature or purpose, we are entirely free—and entirely responsible—for constructing our own subjective meaning, values, and identity. For the existentialist, a meaningful life is one lived authentically according to the values you have chosen for yourself.

Nihilism: The Denial of Meaning

Nihilism, often associated with Friedrich Nietzsche's diagnoses of modern culture, goes a step further by asserting that not only is there no objective meaning, but any attempt to construct subjective meaning is ultimately futile or illusory. Nihilists argue that values, morals, and purposes are human constructs with no real foundation. While 'passive nihilism' can lead to despair, apathy, and the belief that nothing matters, 'active nihilism' views the destruction of traditional values as an opportunity to clear the slate, though it remains skeptical of any permanent replacement for meaning.

Absurdism: Embracing the Tension

Absurdism, formulated by Albert Camus, occupies a unique space between the two. Camus agrees with the nihilist that constructing subjective meaning is a form of self-delusion (which he calls 'philosophical suicide'). However, he rejects the nihilist's slide into despair or indifference. Instead, Absurdism insists that we must live directly in the tension of the Absurd—the conflict between our desire for meaning and the silent universe. The absurdist does not try to resolve this conflict by inventing a purpose (like the existentialist) or by giving up (like the passive nihilist). Instead, they live defiantly, embracing freedom, passion, and revolt in the face of the meaningless void.

If you found this valuable, consider supporting our work.

Key Differences at a Glance